Several sculpted faces receding into shadow while one becomes clearly visible.
For institutions and organisations

The people you are evaluating
are harder to read than they should be.

Applications that tell you very little. Candidates you cannot confidently place. Transitions you cannot predict. The cost is not just poor decisions. It is the decisions you never knew you were getting wrong.

CDA does not replace your evaluation process. It can improve what is available to evaluate.

How it works for institutions

CDA works with individuals through professional assessment and contextual interpretation to produce a clearer, more usable signal. That person then enters your recruitment process, your graduate programme, your university pathway or your team with a signal you can actually read.

The work happens upstream.
The benefit compounds downstream.
Which of these sounds familiar?

The same function applies across different institutional contexts.

These are not separate offerings.

They are examples of where the same visibility work is required.

We receive hundreds of applications, but it is difficult to see who someone really is.
Recruitment and Selection
We invest in graduates, but we are not always sure where they will contribute best.
Graduate and Workforce Programmes
Our students leave with qualifications, but struggle to communicate what they carry.
Universities and Career Services
We know we have capable people, but succession decisions still rely too heavily on familiarity.
Internal Mobility and Succession
We need clearer visibility of individuals before leadership and organisational decisions are made.
Leadership and Collective Alignment
Delivered by two practitioners in defined integration
PVK

Phenyo Victory Kgongwana

Organisation Development and Change Practitioner
The Empowerment Architect
BCom Honours in Applied Economics
book@misspvk.co.za
www.misspvk.com/cda
EM

Eric McAlister

HPCSA Registered Psychometrist
PMT 0102938
BSocSci (Hon) Cum Laude
Psychometry Cum Laude
Without the psychometric layer, the alignment is opinion. With it, it is evidence.
Begin a conversation